|Most Recent Postings|
|New Clothing Restrictions|
Sydney has long had a reputation as the prostitute and drive-by shooting
capital of our proud nation, and the reputation has been reinforced over the
last few weeks with a drive-by shooting spree in a bit of bikie-on-bikie
What a tragedy.
But before joining the sheeple in chanting tired old humanist cliches like
"all humans are equal" and "all human life is sacred" and "all discrimination
is wrong" lets just step back and classify killings according to binary logic
and one appropriate discriminator:
- Criminal bikies killing other criminal bikies.
- Criminal bikies killing innocent bystanders.
- Innocent bystanders killing criminal bikies.
- Innocent bystanders killing other innocent bystanders.
Common sense says that we can eliminate 4), and we like to leave 3) to the
Charles Bronsons of the world, so that really leaves criminal bikies killing 1)
other bikies, and 2) innocent bystanders.
Given that criminal bikies are regarded as bad people (hey, they go around
shooting people - that's pretty bad right?), what exactly is the problem with them being shot? If a rabid dog attacks and kills another rabid dog, is it really
so bad? It doesn't completely solve the problem, but it reduces it by one.
So that brings to the only problem: bikies killing innocent bystanders. So
when is the last time that happened? Well, correct me if I'm wrong Dear Reader,
but I seem recall that was at the father's day massacre in 28 years ago - in
1984, in which a 14 year old girl got caught in the cross-fire in a shoot out
which also killed six bikies. This resulted in 63 murder convictions shared
among 25 bikies.
A tragedy to be sure, but a rational cost benefit analysis suggests
that encouraging rather than discouraging bikies to shoot
each other has to be considered as an alternative to the current zero-tolerance-policy.
If we could avoid the crossfire killings, then this would be a win-win for both
common sense and for public safety.
Unfortunately, a few stray bullets seem to be ending up in the wrong places
- People having their houses shot up because their house used to belong to a bikie. Nasty.
- Getting bullets come through your picture window - bullets which were intended for the flat below you. That's just incompetence.
But these problems can be solved. Police could publish lists of where the
bikies currently live. They could have a web-site, updated daily.
In fact, people could check the web-site (or older cached copies of it) before
buying or renting a home.
An as for the bad shots, if the police had an informal arrangement to slow
down their response time to bikie-on-bikie action, then they would have more
time to aim better. A quiet word with the bikies that shooting involving stray
bullets would be investigated with greater zeal might also make them aim a
little more carefully.
But no, the police have to continue to protect the worst elements of
society with the same zeal as the innocent bystanders, so innocent bystanders
continue to be placed at risk.
And the government has reacted to the 'crisis' in a predictable way - passing
laws to ban 'bikie colors' in some suburbs (like Kings Cross). What a lovely
precedent for aspiring statists! Dictating what people can wear is a favorite
activity of socialist governments. Just look at the suits that Mao inflicted on
his women. Banning 'the kinds of "colors" that bad people wear' is pretty good
I just hope that when the government issues uniforms for us all that they
choose someting flattering.
Red is not my color. Not even in straight jackets.
|Transparency in government|
On a slow news day, media outlets are abuzz with the news that Speaker Peter
Slipper has gotten the boot after allegations of sexual misconduct.
While every self respecting convict descendant (yes that's most of us, dear
fellow Australians) hates politicians, and loves to see these asses hoist by
their own petards (regardless of integrity of any accusations made against
them) lets just spend a few moments being anally retentive, and try to get to
the .. err .. bottom of the claims against him.
Apparently Peter Slipper is accused of inviting a junior employee to stay at
his Canberra house, and then requesting that he shower with the door open. And
there is apparently a video of him climbing through junior staffer's windows,
spooning him in his in his undies, and urinating out the window.
What the ...? Sounds like pretty much par for the course at any gay party house.
So the guy is accused of what exactly? Being a poofter? Since when did that
become a crime again?
And as for it being sexual harassment, inviting someone to have sex is not
sexual harassment. The feminists tried desperately in the eighties to redefine
sexual harassment to include any male who ever asked a girl out on a date, but
that got old really quickly, as beauty challenged women everywhere had visions
of never getting asked out every again, and the feminists alienated themselves
from the mainstream female population (not to mention alienating themselves
from common sense).
Even Bill 'I-did-not-have-sexual-relations-with-that-woman' Clinton didn't
actually harass Paula Jones by merely dropping his trousers and asking if she
wanted sex. His behavior was inappropriate and oafish, but when she declined,
he didn't persist, he just pulled up his trousers (and eventually moved onto
Monica Lewinsky). That's not sexual harassment, just an invitation for sex.
Peter Slippery is also accused of
using his office to foster sexual relations with young male staff members.
Could it be that men use their positions of wealth, authority and power to attract
sexual partners? Somebody alert the media! Well, someone obviously did, and the
media went to town with it. And went to the cities, and the airwaves and the
internet and ..
Guys, calm down. Gay politicians, and politicians having affairs with their
staffers is nothing new. Don't get so precious about it, dears. It's not really
news and getting hysterical about is just a bit silly.
Actually it's just .. well .. a bit gay.
|Housing Bubble - Boom or Bust?|
Consider an investment: You have a 50% chance of doubling your money, and a 50%
chance of halving it. Quick now: do you take the investment?
The correct answer, clearly, is yes. If you take out a large number of
investments like this you would (on average) increase your capital by 25% each
So, let's apply this to buying real estate. You don't really know if house
prices are going to go up or down. Doom-sayers talk about a 'correction' of 50%,
while every real-estate agent seems to insist that you will double your money
'in only a few short years'.
So what do you do? Clearly, you buy now! You borrow the most money you can to
buy the most expensive house you can. Not only did the strategy work well for
your parents, but the logic above is inescapable. Follow the crowd, and you
can't go wrong. Or can you?
Well, the logic makes a bubble which eventually collapses. The probability
of a fall (versus a rise) gets greater and greater, and then property becomes a
So what does this mean? Property won't fall until an overwhelming majority
believe that it will fall. When will that be? Who knows.
In the meantime people will continue to make money. After all, even fools
can be right by chance, like one of the most foolish economists in history
"Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you and I can remain solvent".
China's PLA has oft been criticized as being little more than a mountain of
corrupt flesh. Over-manned, but under-skilled and under-armed. A million
collective tonnes of cannon fodder to stand between a billion sullen
malcontents and their self corrupt serving government.
Overwhelming numbers have worked well for the Chinese leadership since building
The Great Wall. The government of the day ordered that human flesh be turned into
stone and mortar, and it was. A dead body for every meter of wall is a bargain as
long as bodies are plentiful and therefore cheap. When it comes to puting a
low price on a human life, the Chinese are surpassed only by Muslim terrorists.
Losing 94 percent of the army in the Long March might have spelled the mother
of all defeats for Mao and his band of psychopathic commies, but he still had
enough manpower to seize control of Middle Kingdom. Mao understood that The Mob
rules. The Mob will always defeat the individual, however powerful, however
righteous. It wasn't just the voices of the many which drowned out the few.
The sheer mass of numbers assures victory for The Mob.
The PLA successfully followed that model for half a century, so it might
surprise some of us that it has now changed tack. They have copied the American
model of spoilt military generals demanding newer and more exciting toys from
the technology sector. In this case they have demanded (and apparently
received) a shiny new stealth fighter. The Chinese J-20 made an 18 minute
maiden flight in Chengdu on January-11.
Whether this is truly a great leap forward remains to be seen but it does
indicate a small revolution in culture. The Chinese are moving away from their
flesh based strategy, in pursuit of technological one. Why? Because a mountain
of flesh does not make for very effective forward deployment. A stealth fighter
China is about to move from a self-absorbed childhood into a narcissistic but
extroverted adolescence. Eventually the best we can hope for is a reserved, if
The times are going to be very interesting.
Feminists love to scream 'victim' of course, and now they are exploiting the
genitalia of Australia's new PM to score political points.
It seems that our new Prime
Minister Julia Power-Woman Gillard has made a few
fashion faux pas. Like mistakenly wearing a cheap hotel bed-spread, thinking it
was a coat.
Apparently this makes her a victim because 'society' judges women by the
way they look, not by the way do they do their jobs. Of course the feminists
don't say that 'society' in this case is basically other women (since most men
think that a fashionable women is one who is still wearing lacy lingerie in
their internet download). But somehow that still makes women victims of a male
dominated patriarchal society waging an undeclared war against WIMMIN!. Confused?
Well, it gets worse ..
Now there are calls for fashion-model Julia to be given a special clothing
allowance ($70,000 a year of tax-payers money has been suggested) because she
is a woman.
Of course a powerful and confident women couldn't possibly just do what men
do - wear a dark colored business suit with a few changes of shirts and splash
of color from a cravat or something. No no, the first woman to break the
ultimate glass ceiling, the woman who runs the country has no choice but to
conform to society's stereotypes.
In other words, Dear Reader, women should be paid more than men for doing the
same job. And here we were thinking that feminists just wanted equal pay for
Of course some equal pays are more equal than others.
|Reelection chances refloated|
Every proponent of free markets likes to watch an auction. An auction
cuts through the socialist rhetoric about needs, social justice, and
humanitarianism. The rubbish about 'the rights of the stakeholders' counts for
nothing. The auctioneer doesn't care how much you want something. Saying
'but I really, really want it' doesn't cut much at an auction. The
auctioneer will just sell to the highest bidder. If you want it more than the
other guy, you'll bid more for it.
And of course politicians big against each other for votes. Usually they get
elected by promising to spend more money than their opponent, but there
are bids on other things too. US politicians are well known for having execution
auctions ('vote for me because I'll execute more convicts than my opponent'),
but in Australia we are more civilized, and politicians normally confine their
auctioneering to wasting greater and greater sums of hard-earned for taxpayers
Astonishingly, yesterday saw a policy auction between Australian
politicians which didn't simply involve spending more money. This auction was
about asylum seekers. The Labour and Liberal parties were having a 'we'll
deport more asylum seekers than you will' day.
Julia Australia-needs-a-woman's-compassion Gillard
threw down the gauntlet by proclaiming that people should not be labelled
'rednecks' simply for expressing concern over the ever increasing number of
Then Tony he-man Abbott started the bidding by saying
that he would immediately send anyone back who deliberately destroyed their
documentation (asylum seekers are well known for throwing their documentation
overboard just before being picked up by Australian Authorities - it makes it
harder for Australian Authorities to disprove fabricated claims, and helps to
protect their employees - the so called 'people smugglers', who supply
transport, logistics, GPS units and the satellite phones they use to ring the
Australian navy, demanding to be 'rescued').
So Julia look-at-what-I'm-wearing Gillard promised
to set up an offshore processing center in East Timor. Uninvited boaties would
be sent to the center to have their claims processed, and many (like nearly
everyone from Sri Lanka) would never even step foot on Australian soil.
Of course Julia's solution was nothing like
Howard's 'Pacific Solution'. No no.
Little Johnny's solution was to have forlorn and destitute asylum seekers in
Nauru and Papua New Guinea. Julia's solution is to have forlorn and destitute
asylum seekers in East Timor. See the difference? Umm .. anyway ..
This is actually a master stroke by the fashion challenged PM. Because they
couldn't possibly reuse infrastructure set by the previous government in Nauru
or Papua (that would be inhumane), negotiating with the East Timorese, choosing
a site, and setting up the much-more-humane infrastructure in East Timor, will
all take time. That is, Dear Reader, it can't possibly happen until after the
In other words, Julia can call the election, and survive the election
campaign without actually doing anything - just making more promises.
Nice work if you can get it.
There will be a few awkward moments after the election of course (having to
explain why the promised policy changes are now suddenly totally
inappropriate), but that is what politicians do. And everything in politics is
about winning the next election - focussing on later elections is pointless if
the next election is lost, particularly with the half-life of the average
political leader resembling a Chernobyl meltdown.
So Julia has found a solution to take her through an election win. Not a
Pacific Solution, not even really a Timor Sea solution. Just a temporary
solution. Until the next Labour back flip.
Julia is seeking asylum in the rhetoric of a tough border protection
|Why fuss over this?|
For the proletariat, Ayres Rock is the place to go to have your babies eaten
by wild dogs, but the big red rock means considerably more than that to us
Uluru (ie Ayres Rock), is an important symbol of traditional Aboriginal
culture, and many of us remember being forced to sit in school watching grainy
anthropological films of overweight topless Aboriginal women performing their
not-so-secret women's business - dancing around at their corroborees, before
being forced to write essays on the sanctity of multiculturalism.
This is a traumatic image which for most of us, thankfully, fades from memory
over time. But not so for 25 year old French exotic dancer Alizee Sery, who
apparently was to taken by these anthropologist gems that she felt the need to
make a tribute to the traditional owners of Ayres Rock, by doing as the local
Aboriginal women traditionally did - going topless and dancing.
the sake of posterity, she had the presence of mind to bring her own amateur
anthropologist to film the event, and then (in the interests of sharing) put
the film up on youtube.
At this point, one could comment merely on the artistic nature of the film. It
is foreign film made in Australia, which captures the harsh and rugged beauty
of the Australian landscape, and yet contrasts it skillfully with the soft
curves of the female form. But that would miss the significant cultural
contribution of the film itself.
It would be hard to imagine the Aboriginal population objecting to anyone doing
what they had done themselves for the last 40,000 years or so, but the local
Elders seem to have gotten upset once Alizee's film went viral. Local Elders
have been so fired up over Alizee's film that they have even demanded her
Why on earth would they do such a thing?
Maybe they are trying to create a monopoly on topless films?
Or maybe they just don't like French?
|Coming soon to a politician near you|
In this day and age we are expected to be tolerant of those who are
'different'. 'Different', of course means lots of things, but some of us old timers,
'different' generally meant homosexual.
Like in the footy for instance - where gay footballers have recently been
advised to stay in the closet. Whether closet means 'water closet' or 'locker
room' in this instance isn't clear, but basically it's between them, their
friends, families, and their locker-room shower-mates. It's none of our
business, and most of us like it that that way.
There is, of course, a principle here. The price we pay for keeping people out
of our bedrooms is that we stay out of other people's. And in the case of gay
footy players, most of us are happy to oblige.
But does the same standard apply to politicians? Well, in an ideal world it
would. If a senior state-ALP minister were to, say, frequent gay sex clubs (to
pick a completely random example), would it be anyone's business apart from his
friends, family, gay sex partners, anyone with a video camera, any of his
constituents, those who came under his power as a state politician, and everyone
disgusted with the fact that state ministers continually set themselves up as
the high priests of personal and sexual morality?
Well, probably not, but that's an awful lot of us.
Maybe when NSW Transport Minister and closet homo David Campbell campaigned on
platform of 'family values' he should have let us know whether he regarded
anonymous gay sex partners as 'family'. Maybe calling him self 'Camp Bell'
should have rung a .. well .. camp warning bell with the voters, but such
things are not generally regarded as reliable indicators. Unlike video evidence.
In a more rational world, government would limit itself to stopping murder,
rape, assault and theft. But politicians with power are like drug addicts.
They need more and more control over people's lives.
What do you say to someone who dictates what people can watch on the TV, what
they can access on internet, what they can eat or drink, and who they can
marry, and then blames the media for 'unfair media attention of their private
lives'? Only three words: ha ha ha.
Just because the State displays a keen interest in your personal life, does not
mean the state is your friend.
|A nose for political opportunity|
We all like to explore our feminine sides occasionally .. getting
pampered when we are sick, watching the occasional chick flick, employing
that Asian lady with the big boots and the whip ..
But most of us have no interest in exploring our feminist side. Surely
only the most retarded spineless gender apologist would want to to explore total
self-loathing. Which brings us to Tony (Sluggo) Abattoir.
It all started with Sluggo playing to the conservatives, and insisting that a
Sluggo-led government wouldn't raise any taxes, or to introduce new ones. Good
move Sluggo, and self respecting rednecks raised a glass to you. Or at least a
But then he let his teenage daughters talk him around, and convince him to
force the taxpayer to finance their reproductive ambitions. Suddenly he was in
favor of paying middle class women up to $75,000.00 to pop out a baby - paid
for by a great big new tax on big business.
Then he got cornered by Kerry O'Brien on everyone's ABC and admitted that the
two were 'not entirely consistent', and said that he was 'not always entirely
accurate' in the heat of verbal combat, that his words couldn't be taken as
'gospel truth' unless they were in writing.
What was Sluggo thinking? Maybe telling a lie is okay if you say it
quickly enough? ABC journalists do present themselves as the high priests of of
democratic thought. Maybe Sluggo thought he was back in confessional or
Sluggo is perhaps the first politician honest enough to admit lying. Thanks for
your honesty, Tony, but it's a bit hard to sing your praises for this. It's a
bit like the partner who loves you enough to admit to having an affair. 'thanks
for your honesty you deceiving b...'.
But enough about the ex- ..
Normally it's easy to tell when a politician is lying - his lips move. But Tony
(Sluggo) Abattoir has proven to be the exception to the rule. A
politician telling you that he is a liar, is clearly telling the truth.
Sluggo is, of course, not the first politician to break promises. Bob Hawke had
his 'no child in poverty' mandate, Paul Keating had his 'L.A.W. law' tax cuts,
Howard had his 'core promises', Kev's ETS commitments are now on hold
indefinitely, and of course there was George Bush Senior's classic: 'Read my lips. No
But broken promises are not the same as lies. Sluggo, admitting you are lying
doesn't make you seem more trustworthy.
And that's the gospel truth.
|Debt squeeze for the PIIGGS!|
Some of us mere mortals struggle with the complexities and subtleties of
international finance and government borrowing, but in a nutshell Dear Reader,
the Greek sovereign debt crisis can be summarized as follows.
A bunch of thugs (the 'Greek Government') borrowed a whole bunch of money from
some loan sharks (banks in France and Greece) and signed a form promising that
the money would be paid back by someone else (the Greek people). They then used
the money to try to retain power (mostly though buying votes from stupid
Greeks), while all the time lying about how much they were spending and how much
they were borrowing.
Eventually they got caught out in the lies, and two things happened. Firstly
the loan sharks wanted their money back, and secondly, no one wanted to lend
them more money. The thugs weren't able to extort enough money from the Greek
people to pay the interest on the loans, so the whole charade was close to
Exactly why having this charade collapse would be a bad thing is beyond us
mere concrete thinkers. If some common street thugs tried this stunt, then the
lenders would lose their money and everyone would say "It serves you right. Why
did you think that anyone else had an obligation to pay you the money you lent
to those thugs?". Apparently though, basically morality and common sense don't
apply to big governments. Everyone panicked and screams of 'market failure'
convinced the proletariat that a regulated government solution had to be found.
So the thugs got some other thugs (in this case the German government) to lend
them some money, so they could pretend that all the debtors would get their
So how did the German thugs get the money to lend to the Greek thugs? Well
they borrowed it from some other loan sharks, and signed a form saying that
someone else would pay it back (in this case the German people).
And everyone said how good it was for the German thugs to do this. Thank
heavens that the 'market failure' was dealt with with unprecedented government
intervention! Even Wayne Swan made obscure references about the Greek crisis
reminding us that the world economy was not out the woods. And then promptly
used this as an excuse for borrowing another 50 billion dollars on behalf of the
Is everyone suffering lead poisoning here? Or just the voting public?
Think for a moment, Dear Reader: what would happen if market forces were
allowed to do their thing here? Well, the Thugs (the Greek government) would be
unable to tax the Greek people highly enough to pay the interest, and then
simply default on the loans. The banks would lose money. Shareholders would be
unhappy. Heads would roll. Investors would look nervously at all the other
governments who have borrowed trillions of dollars promising repayment by
people who haven't even been born yet, and these governments would have to pay
higher interest on their loans. Irresponsible government defaults would
spread around the world like Greek Fire.
And the fiction that loans to governments are risk free would be totally
discredited. The interest on government loans would be so high that it would no
longer be regarded as responsible to governments to borrow money for 'social
justice', 'equality' or 'economic stimulus'. Governments would still steal from
the populations, but at least they would be stealing from the current
generation (who are better position to stop it) and not from future generations.
And none of this would be market failure - it would be simply the market at
work. Investors would think very carefully about where to entrust their money
in the future. And fifty years of moral hazard could be avoided - specifically
the expectation that bad investment decisions can be undone simply by large
enough government interventions.
But alas this will not happen - at least not yet. The governments of the world
fear the facade dropping to reveal wizard behind the curtain, as the faces of
millions of deceived voters decide that the needs of the many really do
outweigh the greeds of the few. And politicians around the world are closing
ranks. Even the Turkish government has rushed to support its Greek
counterpart. Apparently hundreds of years of hostility, border disputes,
invasions, and religious wars count for nothing when politicians' mutual
interests are involved.
Some of us were taught to be wary of Greeks bearing gifts, but maybe now the
Greeks should show some wariness of German favours -
wooden horses of the world of global financing are disguised as piggy banks.
>> Please Sir, I want some more
- -- Anonymous Coward 2011-12-02 edit
- So what does Merri Rose have on Peter Beattie? -- Another Pirate 2011-06-11 edit
- NONE -- Catherine 2010-01-15 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Strawman 2010-01-15 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Anonymous Coward 2011-11-26 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Anonymous Coward 2011-11-26 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Dissappointed & Embarrassed 2010-01-08 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Strawman 2010-01-08 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Stephanie Nestoros 2009-11-16 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Death to the Whites 2010-04-29 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Strawman 2010-05-15 edit
- Aboriginal History -- Strawman 2009-11-16 edit
- Aboriginal Culture -- Claudia 2009-11-14 edit
- Aboriginal Culture -- Strawman 2009-11-14 edit
- Aboriginal Culture -- your mums a slut 2011-06-20 edit
- opportunity -- evan 2009-09-06 edit
- Feminism -- Anonymous Coward 2009-07-23 edit
- Feminism -- Strawman 2009-07-23 edit
- NONE -- fenrir skaarsgard 2009-04-15 edit
- Fantasies! -- Strawman 2009-04-15 edit
- Anthony Paul Mraz -- Anonymous Coward 2008-06-10 edit
- BRING IT! -- Anthony Paul Mraz (do a background check) 2008-06-10 edit
- Observations of a Yank -- AlisN1dlan 2008-02-10 edit
- Observations of a Yank -- Gal who likes to shove my fist up straight men's butt's 2008-08-28 edit
- NONE -- Beth. 2007-08-13 edit
- NONE -- Strawman 2009-04-15 edit
- NONE -- Michelle 2007-04-22 edit
- NONE -- Strawman 2007-04-22 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Richard 2007-04-01 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- white on black 2009-02-20 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Anonymous Coward 2008-03-03 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Merlene 2007-06-28 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Strawman 2007-04-01 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Anglo Australian, Convict Heritage 2009-05-18 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Strawman 2009-05-20 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Catlicker 2009-09-06 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Strawman 2009-09-11 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- United we stand, Divided we fall 2009-05-12 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Anonymous Coward 2011-04-10 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Strawman 2009-05-12 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Anonymous Coward 2009-06-03 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Strawman 2009-06-03 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- Hannah 2007-08-08 edit
- Aboriginal Issues -- johnny longCock 2007-10-16 edit
- Hello -- Caroline 2007-03-29 edit
- Hello to you too -- Strawman 2007-03-30 edit
- that "angry little feminist" -- Caroline 2007-04-03 edit
- Angry Little Feminists -- Strawman 2007-04-03 edit
- Angry Little Feminists -- Anonymous Coward 2008-05-04 edit
- Kim, Julia and the ALP -- Strawman 2005-01-29 edit
Always remember: Science is the study of white males.|
Copyright © 2002 - 2012. All rights Reserved.
Bikies get dressing down after Sydney shootings
If the Slipper fits ..
Safe as Houses
Nothing says 'look at me' like a stealth fighter
Fashion victims viewed though glass ceiling
French women getting heated up down under
Sizing up before the election
Muslims on the nose again
Selling Short on AGW
Black man becomes white
Some of my best friends are racists
Ready, aim .. FIRE!
Stern warning for who?
Tall poppy syndrome - the opiate of the masses
Socialism - a Good Foundation
Iran so far away
The Rear-admiral's Vice
Racist, Sexist, Redneck Thugs!
Feed the children ..
Taking The PC out of The OLPC
Blood sucking leeches
72 Virgins and counting
Slow learners on ABC
Victim of non-racism demands rights
Well that was $700 billion well spent!
Bundle of Joy for Feminists
The end of capitalism as we know it
Dumbing it down
Bullying In Schools
Baby Sitting at The Lodge
Woman names her teddy Mohammed
Robbing Peter to pay Penny
Socialist health system fails to deliver
Dog eats baby
'I was drunk'
Hate, Lies and Broken Promises
The Religion of Science
Forging young minds
We are not alone
Sheik rattled but not rolled
Manifesto of KRudd
Stupid laws the government could make
Fight them on the beaches
Expressions of anarchy
Organ donor plan rejected by the many
Letters from the Intelligensia
Bruiser takes a Stinging Blow
Killer Whale thrown back
Advance Australia Where?
Thinly Vailed Socialism
Heir brained scheme to feed communist masses
Violence justified because Religion of Peace accused of violence
Credibility sinking as heat rises on sea level claims
Dumbing down education
Telstra Options II
One small mistake for man ..
War on Terror pinned down by liquid explosive
Mayor's popularity hits the fan over recycling proposal
Middle East Skirmish
Morality hostage to blackmail
A Treasurer Scorned
Snow Frozen out of Fyshwick in stinky land deal
What part of 'no' don't you understand?
Chinese whispers okay, but writing too traumatic for children
It was like that when we got here
A Nation of Welfare Whores
A pact with middle Australia
May Day - union thugs celebrate thuggery
Corruption, Ethics, Pragmatics and the AWB
IR Laws off to a good start
Muslim in 50 years?
Dying for solitude
Police Distribute Porn
NSW police offensive
Australia Day - honors among thieves
Stoners feel the squeeze
No protection, no credibility, no justice
An enviable life ..
And the loser is .. London. Oops!
A not very intelligent design debate
Cronulla Beach Bash
Curation is worse than the disease
VSU - Little Johnny plays the Field
We will fight them on the beaches!
Face-off With Ethics Committee
We are all going to drown!
No Nguyen Situation
How to keep your cool in the face of adversity
Up in arms over model Islamic convert
Little Johnny is alert but not alarmed
And so it begins
WSPTOTC Part Infinity - Part II
WSPTOTC Part Infinity - Part I
Mail order brides, bum pinching and political suicide
The more things change, the more things stay the same
Lies, damned lies, and industrial reform
Telstra bushwhacked by rural subsidies
Dry run for 72 virgins
ID cards back on agenda
Tax evasion - merely a right, or actually an obligation?
Farmer moves to greener pastures
Revenge of the Mob
And the loser is .. London!
Live8 - music for the left ears
Heads up for advertising lobby
Maddog pisses into the tent
Killen time in Deep South
Little Johnny compromises with revolting backbenchers
Chairman Chen changes career path
Money and Power
Free Choice, Evolution and Selfish Genes
Insane detention policy
Muslim / Christian relations in the toilet
Bali - the holiday from Hell
Rau erupts over immigration errors
No-one to blame but herself
Like father like son
Death to the suicide bombers!
Oriental fetish or reverse racism?
Advance Australia Inc
Kim, Julia and the ALP
Rats in the ranks
Strike three - you're out!
Mourning Kofi goes down well with latte set
Sobering times for Australian Democrats
What women want - seducing married chicks
Advance Australia Fair
Australia's autistic immigration policy
Sharing the road
No tall poppy syndrome in Afghanistan's budding economy
Property is theft
Price, Laws get Burned
Termination of the debate
Nurturing the public health system
Thais crush Muslim protests
Latham reduces testosterone on front bench
Rats leave sunken ship
How could they get it so wrong?
Perverts caught in the Net
Taxes ain't taxes
Hats off to the French
The Emperor's Old Clothes
New missiles a big hit in Jakarta
Ail the new generation
Children back on board!
Wannabe fails terrorist audition
Radioactive Political Fallout
Left wailing over Israeli wall
Mudslinger cries foul at Dirt Unit
Welfare tit appeals to Australian mothers
Treasurer helps ALP sex up its policies
White males take a beating
It reeks of politics
Fagots simmering over Coalition idiocy
US credibility goes to the dogs of war
US loses moral high ground
The spat on sydney airwaves
Guantanamo Bay - the failure of US justice
When the going gets tough - cut and run!
Fat Chicks and Feeders
Latham to axe ATSIC
No Silver Bullet for Taiwanese Independence
Sex becomes political football
Political correctness overcooked in Dutch oven
The Reign in Spain
Wedgie Politics reaches ball-breaking level
New tack in boaty strategy
Angry young men in the ghetto
Superannuation - age old ploy
High costs of free trade
Value Judgments - The cost of a human life
Food for thought on Nauru
Axis of Evil Wobbles
Thin Veil of Freedom
Into the Enemy's Lair
Rest in Peace
Rats Leave Sinking Ship
Political mudslinging over garbage
Picket Fence holds firm for Fortress Australia
Picket Fence holds firm for Fortress Australia
Political Rebirth from Miscarriage of Justice
Carr Race Issues
China blasts into the 20th century!
Teen Idol - No XS of Talent
Voyage of the Damned
Shuffling the cards no big deal
Barking up the wrong tree
Marginal benefits from taxation
Carr vs Singleton
Outage? What Outage?
Mud thrown in political tussle
The nanny state strikes again
Sea Change in Pacific
Land of the Free
ATSIC chair suspended
Wooing church and state
Execution for Smiling Assassin
Futures in terrorism
Roar of protest
Great Leaps of Faith
So long and thanks for all the fish
Cutting the deck
Taking the Streets
Fine balance on axis of evil
Back into Africa - The Devolution of Civil Society
Sex and Politics
Testing the Waters
Johnny's new Pacific solution
Thin edge-of-the-wedge politics
Black child abuse
Showdown or meltdown?
Johnny Go Lately
Media Bias or Child's Play?
No Free Lunch for Rene
Weapons of Mass Detraction
Should he stay or should he go?
Federal Budget Set to Maximize Vote Buying
Stepping Down ..
Salvation for Governor General
Resigned to Incumbency
SARS - Chinese Government Casualties
Eugenics Mutating in Academia
Leading The Weigh
They're Baaaaaccckkk ...
Tales from the Orientals
Voting Still Not Fixed
Treasure the Memories
Liberation and Redistribution
Vindication or Humiliation?
Blood, Honor and Technology
Spending Other People's Money
Coalition in Peaces
Supply and Demand
Saddam: 1 George: 0
Al-jazeera Joins TV War
Rat in the Ranks
Simon Crean - Moron in waiting
All over bar the shooting
Don't Shoot Back
The Moral Majority
Dead UN walking
Exploring the War Arguments - part 27
Turkey Chickens Out
Human Shields Buckle
China: handle with care
Silly Saddam's al-Samouds
Geoff Comes out Swinging
AIDS Vaccine Fails
London Central - the subsidization .. changes
Sovereignty - Land, Property or People?
Osama Backs Saddam
Take the Money and Run!
Unconscionable Objections in ADF
Contractural Obligations - the good oil on Iraq
Baghdad's Economy about to Boom
Declaration of a Declaration of War!
Iraqi Deaths - How Many is Too Many?
Keeping the Beggars Defiant
Extinguishing the Fire Service
SAS Determined Not to be Late For the War
Where Was the Goverment?
Religious Canberra Witnesses Burning Bush
Simon Says No War (without permission)
Muslims Defend 'Jihad'
Playboy Dictator Pulls Out
Would You Like Ricin With That, Old Chap?
Political Waves in Pacific Solution
Guns not yet Smoking In Iraq
China Blocks Blogspot
Arresting Islamic Movement
ABC Changes Hands
Chechen Rebel Yell!
Happy New Year - Now, Bye Bye
A Regime Change in the Air
North Korea's Showdown
Lies, Damned Lies and Political Statistics
The Right Man for Job
Clarity lost in Drug Haze
Underage 'Dating' in Japan
Shooting Gallery in Ho Chi Minh City
Bomb Building in Australia
All Quiet on the Middle Eastern Front
CIA - All Revved Up and No-one to Kill
14000 Rejectees Vanish
MPs Take Terrorist Positions
The Devolution of Freedom
Tinkering at the Welfare Margins
Sparks Fly Over Cattle Prod Claims
Island Christmas Party for Detainees
Moral Hazard Today: Extreme
Carmen: In Loving Memory
Working for the Dole - down on the Farm
Whine Quietly or the Neighbors Will Hear
'Buy nothing day' unattractive for discerning shoppers.
No asylum seeker shall be in detention from ..?
First Strike - Preemptive Defence or Western Aggression?
Prime Minister Hints at Tax Cuts
A Good Start
Weapons of Mass Distraction
Greens to Drop Voting Age to 16
Classroom Feminism - The Ongoing War Against Boys
Agism - Now White Males can be Victims Too
Not Australians, But They Still Call Australia Home
Undressing Muslim Women
Your Contract With Society
The Big Dot Con
Saddam and George - Still Not Getting On
JI Imports Courtesy of UNHCR Idiocy
Banning the Burqa
Friendly Fire - The Smiling Assassin
Noel Pearson: Vision, Insight and Criticism - but no Solutions.
US War Technology - Beautiful to Behold
For All Her Faults We Love Her So ..
Multiculturalism Withering on the Vine
Another round of anti-Australian hatred
Howard Government Waters Down Free Market Ideals
Elephants? I'll Have Mine Poached
ASIO Hounds Suspected JI Sympathizers
Melbourne Water Nazis - Socially Programming Hitler Youth
Casting the First Stone
Putin is the Man
Simon Crean's Unsurpassed Hypocrisy
Megawati - Cap in Hand
Russia's Reluctant Part in the Theater of War
Children Overboard Ploy Backfires
Shooting off at the Mouth
Can Islam be Redeemed?
Saddam's Odd Thank-you
Greens Win Gold - but ALP Adrift
Don't fight back - it Only Makes Them Angrier
The Rational Warmonger - Cost Benefit Analysis
Measure Your IQ!
Bob's Open Border Solution
We are at War
Tears of Allah's Laughter
New View on Privacy Tradeoffs
War Tax becomes a Tax War
Meningococcal - Sinners Exchanging Bodily Fluids
Simon Says ..
The Yes Man
The Problems that Just Won't Go Away
Housing Bubble Set to Burst
Give Peace a Chance
Genethics still in foetal stage
Saddam's Winter of Discontent
The Ruddocks: Wall to Wall Lawyers
Subsidizing Infantile Logic
Haunted By Tampa Tantrums
Bitter Little Pill for the UN
Drama Queens Seeking Direction
Bush Cooking: The House of Saud?
Bush Burning to Go
Top 10 Worst Reasons to Ratify Kyoto
Top 10 Reasons NOT to Ratify Kyoto
The Song Remains the Same
Australia's History Fades to Gray
Earth Summit Reaches Pinnacle of Stupidity
East Timor's Midwife Becomes its Wetnurse
Baktiari Fiasco Beyond a Joke
Who's Democracy is it?
No Brains. No looks. Sheep
Victims of Success
No Place Like Home
Getting Taiwan Strait
The Mother of all Strategies
Giving It Back
Abbott and Costello. Abbott's on Second.
Prohibition over for Johhny Walker
Sinking like a SIEV
US War Machine - Scalpel or Bulldozer
The Andrews - Keeping the Bitches Honest
Government Airs Dirty Laundry - Quietly
Musical Chairs in the Senate
New Export Market For Australia - Detention Videos
Asylum Seeker Claims and Testability
You Will Not Be Allowed to Assimilate
UK Rejects Rejectees
Laying the Boot Into the Desk Nazi
The Lebanese Hate Crime
Who's Water is it Anyway?
Dr Smoothy Gets the Rough End of the Pineapple
Carr's True Color Sensitivities
Keep That Blood Out of My Gene-pool
And the Winner is - Simon Crean!
Cheryl's Little Secret
Cheryl Laments - 'I was menopausal'
Cheryl Kernot Book P Review
Liberals Double Barrel Dissolution
ALP Hunkers Down For a Long Opposition
Mainland or Bust
Commonsense Escapes Labour's Mandatory Detention Policy
Theophanous Goes Down
Multicultural Tolerance Takes On New Meaning For Asylum Seekers
Lifesavers and Responsibility
Australia's International Obligations
Baise-Moi - the Real Victims Are the Public
Reject Refugees Humiliated
George Asks Koffe's Advice
The Curtin Comes Up On Detainees
Don't be Caught Dead With Infidels
Russians Object to Having Detention Center Near Their Spaceport
This Rose Still Smells Sweet
Brogden Darts Into the Fray
Fortress Australia Beseiged
Porn on Palestine TV
The Joke's on the Gypsies
Sea Levels Rising Faster Than Median IQ
Israelis Double Parked
Drugs? Not a problem!
Waddling OK, But Don't Come Up For Air Too Quickly
Pauline You Pussy!
Jaded Old Woman
Not Stolen - Just Borrowed
US-Sino Relations Fouled Up