|
>> No Strawman, I never said any woman deserves to be raped - that is your
>> deduction. Well, Fiona, I deduced it from your previous statement: >> >> >> We live in a unjust world and if either of the two parties come off badly then
>> >> >> they helped to bring the situation on themselves. 'helped to bring the situation on the themselves'? Sounds like the blame game
to me. >> No woman ever deserves to be raped Really? Tell me: are there any men who deserved to be raped? Or does
the absolution only apply to women? >> And that if you do and you really are raped juries will still see being drunk
>> in many cases as a contributory factor whether they admit it or not. But Fiona, you yourself have stated that it is a contributory factor. What does
'helped to bring the situation on themselves' mean if not that they
contributed to their own rape. You did say 'either of the two
parties', so I am presuming that you judge women here as well as men? >> My morality is not odd ..>> And also that lovemaking with someone who cares about you is infinitely
>> preferable to a drunken fumble with a man who, (possibly), couldn't wait to get
>> rid of you the next day. It's not clear why this is a statement of morality as opposed to
personal preference. There are some women who prefer non-committal
sex, just as some men prefer non-committal sex. Are you suggesting that such
women are 'immoral'? What gives you the right to dictate your morality to these
women? >> My morailty is that my daughters are the most precious things in the world to
>> me and I teach them, as my mother taught me,to put value on themselves and how
>> they are treated. But sons who risk going to prison after being falsely accused of rape don't
factor into this? Doesn't sound very 'moral' to me.
| 
