|
Once again Strawman shows his complete inability to distinguish argument and invective. I especially liked the comparison of Hanson's jailers to the 9/11 terrorists - a master piece of logic, mate, which would get you a job in the Bush administration. Look, like most people I think 3 years was a bit over the odds - the appeals court is anyway likely to reduce it. But she did deserve some punishment for undermining that Qld election, & Mark Latham's point is a good one, which might make a few of those "throw em all in jail and lock away the key" types realise that things are a bit more complex. Anyway, what's a supposed libertarian doing defending a xenophobic, homophobic, rural socialist, pro-protection, pro-conscription, anti-privatisation social conservative anyway?
| 
