|
If you can justify, it, fine. Home invasions, etc do not require them. This draws an interesting comparison between collective and personal self defense. If say, like in a an example talked about by Davi Friedman, that an anarchist society (say Hawaii) could survive if being taxless, would attract high wealth and entrepenuer type individuals. These people would voluntarily bear all of the costs of defense, such as a powerful air force or navy, or possibly nuclear arms. The incentive is personal but the effect is collective. Self defense? Yes, I know about the misuse of language. I encountered it when Amnesty tried to tell me I had a right to all sorts of things. My point is, that some people tmay scream hat the type of relationship strawman points out is abusive. Some people choose to be in such a position. Saying that the women were vulnerable insists they are not of a sound mind, or are being tricked by a far more clever feeder. They are not stupid - they enjoy what they are doing. Hence because I do not think anyone is genuinely stupid, "vulnerability" is a catch cry of regret, IMO.
| 
