|
Dick -- you seem to by lying again. There were no "overwhelming arguments to the contrary". There were several definitions of theft given. Some were consistent with tax=theft... some were not. According to one definition (that took up a lot of time) both conclusions were reasonable depending on various assumptions. I don't doubt that you will continue to repeat yourself in the hope that repetition will make you correct. But you are not correct. The problem is that you are so convinced that you are correct, you see all comments to the contrary as some sort of trick and refuse to re-evaluate the arguments. This (and the fact that you are quite intentionally an asshole about it) is why your absense was not missed.
| 
