|
Firstly, the internet really needs some kind of treaty (although I have no desire for it to be regulated) the current HCA case involving Gutnick proves this. Such a decision, which I do not agree with, would be unenforceable in nations which have free speech enshrined. Anyway, AbL CJ reckons that your web page is like your house, if you see something you don't like leave ( although this shouldn't stop authorities investegating suspicious activites if they have proper authorisation), and so what you publish is like having conversation, unless say you are a media outlet anyway, or there are some notable features that distinguish you as a media outlet (e.g, commercial domain name, advertising you make money out of and so on. Such policing of prostitution is utterly stupid. It isn't going to stop well developed Japanese girls getting money out of toey old businessmen, and they target the wrong person if they are harmed anyway. I'm not saying it's right for a 44 year old man to have sex with a thirteen year old, or is it going to be tolerated by most people, but cases like these need to be judged on their own merit - wether each girl had proper control over their faculties. Basically, prostitution shouldn't be policed, if they are not prostitutes, and do get lured by a person taking advantage of them, chances are, they will complain. This can't be stopped either, commonsense stops this, if you think your kids are gullible, get netnanny or whatever. As for taxes, taxing fixed resources and consumption would catch them out in the end.
| 
