|
I will start by reiterating at the outset a point I shall make later, and that is that I do not respond to abuse. If you have a decent argument to make, then do so. But simply abusing me or calling me names is not something that warrants a response. While the social fabric unravels, and little children suffer, all you can do is peddle simplistic Libertarian nonsense and abuse people who challenge it, and presumably think yourself smart. Well, there are people here far smarter than you; and as I have pointed out to ABL on several occasions already, abuse is no substitute for a credible argument and does not deserve a response. Further, what we can read into your abusive response is that you clearly do not have a credible response as you are unable to argue the point on its merits. I am not suprised at your confusion, since together with ABL you have
become confused in debate with me previously. No man is an island, but is it not fair to conclude that, to use the type of language you would use, you have been shafted by a higher form of intelligence but do not have the backbone to admit your error - a man of straw indeed! I do not resile from proclaiming the Word of God on this forum; nor for pointing out the logical deficiencies in the arguments of the anacronisms who leave messages here; peddling Libertarian ideologies while Rome burns. As I have said before, there are two streams any man can take: will it be the river of love - His love - or will you finish up on the rocks? The choice is yours, and while sometimes I may sound a tad frustrated with you, I shall still pray that you and ABL, as well as Tex, find the right stream in time.
| 
