Your sacred cow is in mortal danger Provoking the herd since 2002 

home

 Let's talk about ..
Be Offended - Be Very Offended Shoot the cow! Shoot the cow!  

S-e-x
Religion
Politics





 You Asked for It!
» Superannuation - age old ploy   2004-02-15 23:29 Strawman
Staring down the Maddog

Getting a wedgie is not one of happiest school memories for those of us who didn't take karate classes or felt that 'school bully' was an inappropriate qualification on a future Curriculum Vitae. But at least the feeling of being split up the middle felt politically balanced. Sadly, wedge politics doesn't make the grade.

The Howard government has pursued this strategy very successfully in the last eight years by spotting the fundamental contradictions in the left-wing belief set. All marriages have inbuilt tensions, marriages of convenience doubly so. Starting arguments within married couples is always good fun at dinner parties, and Janette must have given enough of them for (the normally socially inept) Little Johnny to have mastered the strategy. Doubtless Johnny's education at Canterbury Boy's High educated him on the effectiveness of the wedge, and he has been playing wedge politics ever since.

Much to the chagrin of The Left, who, under Johnny's Regime are no longer able to suppress discussion on those 'difficult' areas which they were able to silence for so long. Nothing like little dirty laundry in public to cause some political embarrasment.

But the new hero of The Left, the intellectual politician, the man with the ideas, Mark (Madog) Latham thought he would give the PM a wedgie by bringing up the issue of superannuation reductions for the politicians. Unfortunately the attempt backfired. After letting Peter (PM-wannabe) Costello make a fool of himself on radio by dismissing the idea, Johnny simply accepted it.

There is nothing quite as alarming as drawing a line in the sand for an adversary and having them march right up to it "oh, you mean this line?. OK - I'll see you and raise you." - even though the reduction only applies to new politicians, not the current ones.

Of course the Left claimed victory - they could hardly do anything else. But now the opposition has to make noises about applying it to the current politicians too to make themselves sound more sincere than Johnny. Johnny would love to do this - he can afford to lose more than the Mark Lathams of the world - he's been an MP for longer.

Unfortunately Johnny can't do this, the prospect of MPs suing the government for breach of contract over their agreed superannuation payouts would be a giggle for the rest of us, but it's not a legacy that Johnny is willing to leave.

The cynics may observe that this is yet another example of the government legislating a transfer of money from the Gen-Xers to the Baby Boomers, but that's nothing new. The Baby Boomers are well and truly overrepresented in positions of power and influence, and the government rarely makes any decision to financially disadvantage them for the benefit of others.

Now Maddog has to face the wrath of any new MPs, and for the the ALP to win government, that means a lot more new ALP MPs than the Coalitition - and a lot more disgruntled ones. Oops.

A party room full of people saying 'Mark, you're doing a great job. Just don't .. like .. make any more suggestions, OK?'? Its just what Johnny needs to push Latham back to a small target strategy. It worked against Kim (Fatboy) Beazley, and Johnny's conservative nature means he'd prefer history to repeat.

Why change a winning formula?


 Submit Your Own Comments