|
>> Nothing in that Telegraph quotes leads to the extraordinary conclusion that you
>> are making. Why would you bypass the most common sensical explanation,
>> i.e. everything that happened in Australia was disallowed because heresay
>> evidence not being allowed, The quote from the Telegraph was the chief judge said he couldn't take into
account events which happened in Australia. We was NOT quoted by the Telegraph as saying that he couldn't take into account
heresay about what happened in Australia. If you don't understand the difference, we have little to discuss. >> .. and make an incredulous assumption that Indonesian
>> Judges were told that there is no other country outside Indonesia? You aren't very good at comprehension are you? Once again, lets look at what I
actually wrote:
>> Maybe Indonesian Judges are told the same thing about Indonesia.
Conclusions do not start with the word "maybe". This is a silly argument. Could you actually read what I have written before
replying further? Thanks.
| 
