|
>> Lets try and keep this really simple for you! Does that mean that you will conduct this debate without resorting to
complex and far-fetched conspiracy theories like so many of your leftist
colleagues? Excellent! Then lets begin .. >> 1) It is not known who set the bomb off, the two most plausible suspects are
>> either a member of the demonstration or an agent provacatour (probably acting
>> under the orders of the Pinkerton Detective Agency). Did you say a member of the demonstration? IE one of the rioting
thugs? Then we are in full agreement. The thugs threw the bomb which killed police. >> 2) The firing back in self defence was in response to the police firing wildly
>> upon the demonstrators, not the bombing. Who ever said that the thugs firing at police was a response to the bombing?
Lets the the order straight:
- Thugs throw bomb.
- Police fire at thugs.
- Thugs fire at police.
Not complicated. >> It was fortunate that some citizens
>> were armed and were able to defend their unarmed fellows. Absolutely! Otherwise those unarmed thugs would have had to .. like .. run away
after one of their murderous brethren mob threw the bomb. Very fortunate
indeed. >> 3) The rally was indeed peaceful:"Throughout the speeches the crowd was
>> orderly. Mayor Carter Harrison, who was present from the beginning of the
>> meeting, concluded that "nothing looked likely to happen to require police
>> interference"." Yes riots get ugly very quickly. Kind of like standover men in the mafia, who
will ask for your money very nicely - right up to the point where you say
'no'. One thing I have learned about left wing thugs: they are impulsive, violent and
sometimes unpredictable. Comforting to think that some things never change. >> 4)The bomb was thrown towards the end of the rally, when a large group of
>> police arrived and ordered the people to disperse. Yes, the riot started getting violent, and police thought it was best to clear
the street. Unfortunately they didn't anticipate the murderous intent of some
of the rioting thugs. >> Ironically "Medical evidence
>> later showed that most of the injuries suffered by the police were caused by
>> their own bullets." That is a tragedy. Clearly they didn't have the proper training to deal with
those kinds of situations. I would like to believe that modern police forces have
better training to deal with acts of thuggery and terrorism. >> My logic is fine, but you do seem to have problems with facts! Well, we seem to agree on most of the facts. You just arrive at some weird conclusions.
| 
