Your sacred cow is in mortal danger Provoking the herd since 2002 

home

 Let's talk about ..
Be Offended - Be Very Offended Shoot the cow! Shoot the cow!  

S-e-x
Religion
Politics





 You Asked for It!
» Spending Other People's Money   2003-04-06 21:42 Strawman

>> I dont think it's that bad. Why are you so fixated upon 'free market'
>> when this is going to be the best path to achieving that? Sure the US could
>> give out contracts to everyone, but imagine explaining to the people that you
>> made all the other nations gain a bit of wealth without them even having to
>> suffer to get it?

Free market means different things to different people. When I say free market in this case, I mean getting the best value for the price. If parties are excluded from bidding (ie trade) because of political reasons (like being French), then you are unlikely to get the best value for price - in the same way as if you say 'only people with a letter 'g' in their name can apply for this job' then you are likely to miss out on the best deal.

As for other nations gaining a bit of wealth without having to suffer, I don't see the relevance. The best bidder (by definition) will make the Iraqis better off. I don't think that would be hard to explain to the Iraqis.

As for explaining it to the Americans, well, they chose to go do war (and I support their doing so). But this doesn't mean they own Iraq. They claimed to be liberators, not colonizers, and now they have to live up to that.

>> I believe a nation should be accountable only to its residents. 'Free Market' >> clearly has its benefits, but I wouldnt get so carried away by the ideal that I >> ignore the sacrifices made by the Americans to get to those markets in the >> first place.

I've never been to New York, but I am told that people come up and start singing to you on trains, and if you even look at them, they demand a dollar for singing the song. 'But I entertained you. You watched my performance. You owe me a fair price for my services'. New Yorkers know that the way to avoid this is to totally ignore them.

Basically I have a problem with someone asking for money from a party which did not choose something, and which was not negotiated. It costs about $120,000 to raise a child. Should a parent ask for that money when the child turns 18? The child did not ask to be born, and didn't negotiate a rate for being raised.

I'll have the private school, the violin lessons, and the regular beatings for misbehavior, thanks. Just put it on the tab.

While I think the Americans have done a good thing, I don't think the Iraqis owe them money (or even oil). If they do pay the US voluntarily, I think more highly of them, but that is all.


 Submit Your Own Comments