Your sacred cow is in mortal danger Provoking the herd since 2002 

home

 Let's talk about ..
Be Offended - Be Very Offended Shoot the cow! Shoot the cow!  

S-e-x
Religion
Politics





 You Asked for It!
» Victim of non-racism demands rights   2008-10-26 14:20 Strawman
Trumped at last!

Dealing the race card has been a time honoured favorite for a generation of ethnic minorities. Whenever you don't get something you asked for (like someone else's money for instance), just throw yourself on the floor and scream 'racism' repeatedly. It works for small children, so why not victims of racial discrimination?

Of course time marches on, pets die, children grow up, and societal attitudes to things like institutionalized racial discrimination evolve. But not always for the better.

Like in the case of former ATSIC commissioner Alan Wolf, who is suing the Tasmanian Aboriginal Council for not being racist. Yes, dear reader, for not being racist.

The Australian reports that Alan Wolf, who has presumably based his entire career on claiming to be a member of the institutionalized racial minority (that would be the Australian Aborigines for anyone who doesn't get out much), has suddenly found that the Tasmanians don't accept his qualifications as an Aboriginal and won't give him preferential treatment in his application for a fishing licence. He may have apply with all the white people at the back of the bus.

If this all seems a little confusing to anyone with a logical mind, It really is totally logical. You just aren't considering the bigger picture.

Remember that Aborigines (by weighted genetic proportion) are actual less than two percent of the population. That's not much to support a political movement. [Actually it's probably about the same as the Libertarians, and look how spectacularly ineffectual they have been in changing Australian politics]. Even as a special interest group, the percentage is too low to have much effect.

So in the heady '80s, Aboriginal lobby groups decided that the best special interests of the Aborigines were served by an 'inclusive policy'. That is, get as many people as possible to claim to be victims of the Aboriginality, regardless of whether they were, or weren't actually of pre-European ancestry. Even in Tasmania.

And boy it worked. Never was there so much hand-wringing and self flagellation for such a small minority group. And the buckets of money started flowing into 'Aboriginal concerns'.

This might have been a surprise to those of us unfortunate enough to have been educated by the Tasmanian State education system. We were taught that the last full blooded Tasmanian Aboriginal was a woman called Truganini, who died in an Aboriginal settlement in 1876 (far too soon to have given birth to modern political correctness).

But the money still flowed. And nothing exceeds like success. Once money (and affirmative action policies) were flowing. Then a new strategy was effective - to maximize your share of the trough by locking people out. Suddenly, people of questionable ancestral qualifications were having that ancestry questioned.

One of the fastest growing populations in the world has suddenly started shrinking. A new genocide, or just a mercy culling of a stupid political movement?

Normally leftist political movements shrink when the government money supply is cut. But in this case the movement is just reeling from a reduction in blood supply.