 |
| Feminazis | |
Channel 10 reports that a Melbourne school has introduced a scheme for bullies:
compulsory dancing. Boys who are prone to bullying are forced to wear leotards and
participate in ballet dancing classes. This is almost on par with the early 1990s idiocy some schools in California,
where boys were forced to wear dresses. Let's review history to see how we have ended up here:
- Gough (i-never-did-anything-wrong) Whitlam set up the Family Law Court in
1975. This was a new branch of law which was was immune from
public scrutiny and accountable to no-one, except themselves.
- Carefully crafted 'non-gender specific' legislation ensured that a)
custody of children would
automatically be given to the mother, and b) women could not be forced to allow their children
access to their fathers.
- Generous 'single parent's welfare', and compulsory child
support ensured that there were no shortage of women volunteering for this
victim role.
- As a result a generation of men were raised by their mothers. [Argue about
the use of the word 'generation' if you want, but if 13% of part-aborigines constitutes a
'stolen
generation' ..]
- Feminist hysteria
about child molestation forced or scared male teachers out of the teaching
profession.
- The female dominated teaching profession, helped along by feminist hysteria about rights for girls gradually
feminized the school curricula, to the point where girls now outperform
boys in every subject. Of course when boys outperformed girls it was
proof of discrimination, but when girls outperformed boys it was because of
their natural abilities in concentration and reason.
The result? A generation of boys alienated by a school system which they
regard as irrelevant to them, raised by their mothers with no strong male
role-models except for older boys in gangs. Ie - bullies. And the feminist-school-curriculum solution? Ballet classes for the boys!
Maybe if they just give all the boys female hormones and make them act more
like girls they will get the behavior they want? Not that there is anything wrong with boys doing ballet, but forcing them to do it is the
worst solution. Ultimately boys want to be like the strong male role-models
they see around them - fathers, or responsible male teachers. They might line
up for the TV cameras and
say how great ballet is - this is their sound-byte of fame, but trying to
forcibly feminize them will ultimately just create alienation and anger. Of course the perpetrators of this perverse little scheme have nothing but
praise for it. 'We have turned bullies into Billy Elliots', 'they
have greater confidence', 'they have a greater awareness of their own
bodies'. Doubtless estrogen treatment would also elicit the same defenses from
these feminists. And at $20,000 per school, there are some nice little
kickbacks for them too.
| 
