Your sacred cow is in mortal danger Provoking the herd since 2002 

home

 Let's talk about ..
Be Offended - Be Very Offended Shoot the cow! Shoot the cow!  

S-e-x
Religion
Politics





 You Asked for It!
» Tales from the Orientals   2003-04-22 00:05 Strawman
Backs to the Wall in China

There are two kinds of people in the world. There are those who freely admit to making a mistake immediately after they realize it, and try to avoid it in the future. And there are those who try to cover mistakes up, and then lie about it even when the error (and the lies) are exposed. It takes a lot of confidence, and sometimes courage to admit to making mistakes, and many people think that it is a sign of good upbringing. People will carry into adulthood the strategy which worked best in their childhood.

Bureaucrats, of course, are notorious for covering things up, and countries with the biggest bureaucracies (command economies) could be expected to cover up more than freer political systems. The most famous example is the Soviet Union's nuclear reactor meltdown in Chernobyl - the entire Soviet bureaucracy simply went into cover-up and denial mode, in spite of the fact that it was quite obvious that even the legendary Soviet information suppression machine was no match for a disaster of that scale.

Now it comes as no surprise to some to find that the Chinese government has been lying again. This time they have been lying about the number of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) cases in the country. Previously we were told that only 4 had died in China, suddenly the number has been 'revised' up to 20. And the previously 44 cases has been 'revised' upward to 248.

When the SARS outbreak looked like it was small and controllable, the media control could contain the facts. But then the outbreak spread to other countries, and the World Health Organization (WHO) became involved. For a while the Chinese just kept lying and blocked WHO's access to information. Eventually though, the pressure became too much, and the truth had to be told.

Chinese Authorities are still denying any wrong doing - blaming 'bureaucratic inefficiencies' and 'poor communication' for the 'incomplete information' available. But in a concession to popular expectations of government accountability they found some scapegoats, sacking the Health Minister and the Mayor of Beijing.

Seeing junior politicians falling on their swords to protect the careers of more senior politicians is something we normally only expect in enlightened democracies like Australia.

In a country where telling a lie - any lie - has been safer than telling the truth, this is a significant shift. Now it seems, even telling a lie may not save you. How can Chinese bureaucracy function with that level of uncertainty?


 Submit Your Own Comments