Your sacred cow is in mortal danger Provoking the herd since 2002 

home

 Let's talk about ..
Be Offended - Be Very Offended Shoot the cow! Shoot the cow!  

S-e-x
Religion
Politics





 You Asked for It!
» Food for thought on Nauru   2004-01-07 23:53 Strawman
But Monsieur, it's only wafer thin!

Busted-arsed pacific Island nation Nauru has hit the headlines again with news of a hunger strike by failed asylum seekers, which your (ever balanced) ABC reports has now been going on for a month.

Desperate people do desperate things, and the pro-asylum seeker groups are clearly pretty desperate. Normally, of course, people who go on a hunger strike lapse into a coma at 10-12 days, and die after three or four weeks.

So it really is make or break time. No-one has died yet, and unless they can produce a corpse, then their credibility will get stinky really soon. The occasional snack is apparently slipping through the the stitching on the lips. Asylum seekers are well known for their hunger striking strategies, which seem similar to smokers giving up the habit. Going on a hunger strike three times a day (after breakfast, after lunch and after dinner) doesn't really qualify.

How seriously will people take claims of a hunger strike after two months? At that time it will be pretty obvious that these people are cheating more than the fat chicks at the Jenny Craig clinic.

The bankrupt Nauru government has been pretty keen to take full advantage of the fuss too - insisting that the strain on their medical resources is life threatening, and they need more money. But a little bit of history helps to put things into perspective here. Before their asylum seeker led recovery, Nauru was in pretty dire straits. In particular, Australia was gently threatening to refuse further treatment until Nauru payed their medical bills (for services provided by Australia). The obesity levels amongst the Nauru population don't exactly make for a healthy population.

Forgiving the debt and providing money for medical services was part of the deal struck with Nauru for housing the asylum seekers, but that hasn't stopped the politicking. Whining about imminent death may squeeze a few extra bucks out of the Australian government, so it's worth a try.

Interestingly there has been no official request from Nauru - that might open a full can of worms, and start a bidding war between busted-arsed pacific nations. The corrupt Nauru government knows full well that they will lose power if Australia takes their asylum seekers elsewhere and turns it's back on the busted arsed country.

They may bark objectionably at any opportunity, but they are unlikely to bite the hand that feeds them, and a stern word will reduce them to whimpering dogs. They can't have their bone and eat it too.

  • Update 2004-01-11 -- Strawman 2004-01-11